Link for Picture: http://blog.felinemusings.com/2008/11/04/a-spiritual-perspective-in-support-of-euthanasia/
Euthanasia. Yes, it is a devaluation of human life, and nobody should be directly responsible for holding a responsibility over someones, anyones death. But does the fact that assisting someone who is clutching on their lives for whatever dignity they can have left, demoralize your reputation? Even if it does, will the comprehension that you just did a service to someone by allowing them to become a preferable and jovial person in life give you knowledge that you did a devoted deed as an understanding human being? Death is a fear for all of us, and if a person believes that they have had enough of the intolerable pain in this world, and they have enough dignity to declare with conviction that they believe the time is right for them, what could you say against it? I am fully persuaded by the fact that Euthanasia necessitates legality, and if it cannot, and various people have different viewpoints of it, then what do you think would change the fact that through the pain they are suffering at the moment, they will not pass away anyways? The comprehension of the torment they are facing will only come to you when you see and perceive it through your own eyes.
There are innumerable disputations over the legality of euthanasia, legalizing euthanasia would assist in diminishing the adversity of incurable patients. In a strive to contribute medical and psychological caution to the patient, a doctor can and should advise medicines that will relieve torment even if the medications provoke gross side effects towards the patient. This connotes that coping with affliction and anguish should be the prime concern even if it impacts the life expectancy of the patient. Euthanasia imitates the same process, but it allows the patient to die with tranquility and whatever the consequence, at the end of the line, only happiness is the outcome. Any human being has the right to quote that they want to discontinue they’re treatment in a hospital, so if they have the entitlement to do that then why don’t they have the authority over themselves to be able to shorten their existence and release the insufferable distress. A person should be allowed to resolve the value of life for him/her self, and not bear in mind the opinions that differ from your own.
I watched a movie called “Guuzarish”, it was a Hindi movie and the philosophy of the movie was concerning Euthanasia. The man was a magician and he got paralyzed whilst executing a magic trick in one of his shows, nothing would ever alter his fate anymore. He lived and6 stayed as he was for many years, but he could not handle the fact that his body wasn’t allowed to do the things that he told them to do. His rage towards himself was unbearable and the suffering he was going through was intolerable, so he filed a petition in court seeking permission to end his life. The court rejected his petition and he was immensely astonished by the fact that their understanding of his pain was so unfavourable, he filed another petition and the judges themselves came to his home. Everyone was gathered in his hall, and he placed a box in front of them, and told one of the judges to get inside the box. The judge was startled with this statement and stared blankly at him, again he quoted “get in the box” and without any further negotiation the judge climbed into the box and he locked it. After 10 seconds the judge started shouting and banging to let him out, and the other judges started yelling to let him out, 5 seconds later the box was opened by one of the magicians assistants. The magician simply recited, “You could not bare 10 seconds of my life and you expect me to go on with mine”. The judges were silenced and speechless towards this and walked out the door with unsupportable resolutions.
What can you say that is unsympathetic towards this? Does the fact that you indicate that euthanasia is a deficient deed vary the patients understanding or despair?
The only places in the world where euthanasia is legal is in Oregon, Washington, Montana, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. The conditions of voluntary euthanasia include:
If these were the guidelines that were constructed for euthanasia then why is it in denial in most countries?
In the 1970’s the Netherlands concluded with an agreement that as long as there were legal and medical authorization to guarantee that the patient was secure, there would be no disputes over a physician prosecution for helping a patient die as long as unquestionable guidelines were placed in order. If this country is able to collaborate with a decision that will allow things to only become more superior, then why can’t we come together as ‘one’ world and allow this world to become better?
The debatable opinions you can have about euthanasia is dependent upon the fact of what you believe the worth of human life is. Euthanasia today is a topic that is based on values rather than facts, and this is the reason the arguments about legalization for it will only ever go on and on. For almost anything there are always different viewpoints and in this case, there is the one that allows you to think it is a disheartening factor, but what I am trying to prove is that the human themselves should be allowed to assess the possession of having a human life. A simple essay won’t change the way the world sees it, it depends on you to spread the message, without having different viewpoints of euthanasia people could see that it is delightful to see someone else happy, and if you could do it by simply killing them, why not?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/euthanasia-voluntary/
There are innumerable disputations over the legality of euthanasia, legalizing euthanasia would assist in diminishing the adversity of incurable patients. In a strive to contribute medical and psychological caution to the patient, a doctor can and should advise medicines that will relieve torment even if the medications provoke gross side effects towards the patient. This connotes that coping with affliction and anguish should be the prime concern even if it impacts the life expectancy of the patient. Euthanasia imitates the same process, but it allows the patient to die with tranquility and whatever the consequence, at the end of the line, only happiness is the outcome. Any human being has the right to quote that they want to discontinue they’re treatment in a hospital, so if they have the entitlement to do that then why don’t they have the authority over themselves to be able to shorten their existence and release the insufferable distress. A person should be allowed to resolve the value of life for him/her self, and not bear in mind the opinions that differ from your own.
I watched a movie called “Guuzarish”, it was a Hindi movie and the philosophy of the movie was concerning Euthanasia. The man was a magician and he got paralyzed whilst executing a magic trick in one of his shows, nothing would ever alter his fate anymore. He lived and6 stayed as he was for many years, but he could not handle the fact that his body wasn’t allowed to do the things that he told them to do. His rage towards himself was unbearable and the suffering he was going through was intolerable, so he filed a petition in court seeking permission to end his life. The court rejected his petition and he was immensely astonished by the fact that their understanding of his pain was so unfavourable, he filed another petition and the judges themselves came to his home. Everyone was gathered in his hall, and he placed a box in front of them, and told one of the judges to get inside the box. The judge was startled with this statement and stared blankly at him, again he quoted “get in the box” and without any further negotiation the judge climbed into the box and he locked it. After 10 seconds the judge started shouting and banging to let him out, and the other judges started yelling to let him out, 5 seconds later the box was opened by one of the magicians assistants. The magician simply recited, “You could not bare 10 seconds of my life and you expect me to go on with mine”. The judges were silenced and speechless towards this and walked out the door with unsupportable resolutions.
What can you say that is unsympathetic towards this? Does the fact that you indicate that euthanasia is a deficient deed vary the patients understanding or despair?
The only places in the world where euthanasia is legal is in Oregon, Washington, Montana, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. The conditions of voluntary euthanasia include:
- is suffering from a terminal illness;
- is unlikely to benefit from the discovery of a cure for that illness during what remains of her life expectancy;
- is, as a direct result of the illness, either suffering intolerable pain, or only has available a life that is unacceptably burdensome (because the illness has to be treated in ways that lead to her being unacceptably dependent on others or on technological means of life support);
- has an enduring, voluntary and competent wish to die (or has, prior to losing the competence to do so, expressed a wish to die in the event that conditions (a)-(c) are satisfied); and
- is unable without assistance to commit suicide.
If these were the guidelines that were constructed for euthanasia then why is it in denial in most countries?
In the 1970’s the Netherlands concluded with an agreement that as long as there were legal and medical authorization to guarantee that the patient was secure, there would be no disputes over a physician prosecution for helping a patient die as long as unquestionable guidelines were placed in order. If this country is able to collaborate with a decision that will allow things to only become more superior, then why can’t we come together as ‘one’ world and allow this world to become better?
The debatable opinions you can have about euthanasia is dependent upon the fact of what you believe the worth of human life is. Euthanasia today is a topic that is based on values rather than facts, and this is the reason the arguments about legalization for it will only ever go on and on. For almost anything there are always different viewpoints and in this case, there is the one that allows you to think it is a disheartening factor, but what I am trying to prove is that the human themselves should be allowed to assess the possession of having a human life. A simple essay won’t change the way the world sees it, it depends on you to spread the message, without having different viewpoints of euthanasia people could see that it is delightful to see someone else happy, and if you could do it by simply killing them, why not?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/euthanasia-voluntary/
http://www.euthanasia.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment